The current book I'm reading is driving me mad (quite literally.) I've had to put it down a few times and take deep breaths.
I know there are two sides to almost every story, but I have trouble seeing that when it comes to infidelity. And when that infidelity is related to having "suppressed your lesbian side" by getting married to a man, I am surprised that I have such little sympathy, given those actions are often driven by societal pressure and both internal and external homophobia.
I totally get the suppression part, I do. I've spent most of my adult life bottling up certain parts of me. But I've remained single instead. I didn't up and marry a man because I was so "scared" (as the main character in this book is) of who I really am. When a person does something like that they not only hurt themselves, they hurt other people (especially their spouse) as well.
Another part of the book that is upsetting is something that also happens in real life. One of the straight women (also married) in the story is intrigued by a lesbian she meets and giggles a lot and thinks how "neat" it would be to see what it's like with another woman. This infuriates me even more because it's all a matter of "play" to the woman. She doesn't want love, she wants an experiment and uses her fantasies to fuel her love life with her husband.
This kind of attitude (much as the kind that goes with a straight woman wanting to have her cake and eat it too) is incredibly painful to a lesbian who is single and honest as possible and trying to find real love. You can't go into traditional marriage because you want to deny who you are and then one day finally be true to yourself and yet still want to stay married to a man while you "date" your girlfriend.
Arghhh! I just want to scream so much right now, even as I desperately want to understand (maybe even empathize) since the far far right instill these beliefs (the kind "ex-gay therapy" supports) that to can lead to marriages ending and thereby possibly threatening a very sacred institution...the very thing homophobic organizations like N.O.M. say gay people do.
Also from today's New York Times:
Many years ago, when I was an innocent lamb making my first appearance on a right-wing radio talk show, the host asked, “If you don’t believe in God, what’s to stop you from committing murder?” I blurted out, “It’s never actually occurred to me to murder anyone.”
Even though I believe in God, it's long irked me that some people think atheists aren't moral people. If anything, a person not believing in God (and therefore possible eternal damnation in Hell) and still doing the right thing means she's doing the right thing for the right reason, not because of some fear of punishment:
read more here: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/books/review/living-the-secular-life-by-phil-zuckerman.html
Okay, so I am
addicted to Google Play Books and discovered a book by Havelock Ellis that has
some rather interesting insights on sex.
I don’t know to how to quote what I
found intriguing without sounding rather crude (the book is surprisingly
graphic for the late 19th century). In less crude terms, I’ll say what I think
Ellis is saying and that is this: sex may seem highly biological and messy (he
uses “evacuation” instead of the much more common modern term that also starts
with “e”) but it has to be more if it comes with such a high intensity of
emotion.
I can't believe how
many times I've been experiencing something in my own life and then pick up a
book that I have just started reading
and it's like the passage was meant for me to see:
The relation of love
to pain is one of the most difficult problems...why is it that love inflicts,
and even seeks to inflict, pain? Why is it that love suffers pain and even
seeks to suffer it?
Picking up the book
to read more of the "Love and Pain" chapter from one of this books I
find myself more fascinated with the non-personal related aspects of it all and
get sucked into the leaning and human interest parts. Reading and learning has
so often been able to pull me out of myself and realize how universal
alienation can be.